Connect with us

HEALTH

Pandemic learning loss needs urgent attention in US, national survey finds

Published

on

A little boy in math class is overwhelmed during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Getty images)

According to a recent survey of 26 million K-8 students by researchers at Stanford, Johns Hopkins, Dartmouth and Harvard, the “educational harm” caused by the coronavirus pandemic has been “devastating.” The researchers also found that the pandemic has “exacerbated economic and racial disparities in education,” as lead authors Tom Kane of Harvard and Sean Reardon of Stanford wrote in a New York Times essay accompanying the publication of their findings last week.

Standardized test scores also showed American students losing ground in math, reading, history and social studies. But the new findings, which are part of the Education Recovery Scorecard, add important — and worrisome — context, as well as a call for urgent action.

Top line

In a survey of 7,800 communities in 40 states and Washington, DC, Kane, Reardon and colleagues Found out that between 2019 and 2022, the average “US public school student in grades 3-8 lost the equivalent of half a year of math and a quarter of a year of reading.”

Long-standing educational disparities also played a role: the less wealthy and white a community was, the more likely it was to suffer losses from the pandemic. It means the so-called gap in education what politicians have been desperately trying to shut down is only getting wider.

Consequences of school closures

An empty playground at a public school in New York, November 2020. (Wang Ying/Xinhua via Getty)

By the fall of 2020, it was clear that children were not contracting serious or fatal cases of COVID-19. Schools also did not become the sites of the massive outbreaks that some feared. However, in many districts, especially those controlled by Democrats, schools remained closed to in-person instruction until 2021.

By the end of 2022, researchers found that distance learning causes marked learning loss. In a summary of their findings, the authors of the Education Recovery Scorecard reinforce the evidence for this correlation.

“Counties that spent more time on distance learning in 2020-2021 suffered big losses,” they write.

And these losses, they found, were especially noticeable in communities where parents were employed in “essential” jobs that took them away from home. the result of labor obligations.

social capital

A young girl sits at a desk and participates in a video call with her teacher through a laptop.  (Getty images)

Child on videoconference with his teacher. (Getty images)

Kane, Reardon and their colleagues do not blame distance learning for all the learning losses they noted. Taking a more subtle stance, they argue that community-level factors also played a role.

In communities with higher COVID death rates, losses in math were more noticeable. Especially in the early stages of a pandemic. deaths were concentrated in communities of color with multi-generational households and limited access to green spaces.

Not surprisingly, children fared better if they had access to broadband internet. Asian and white households are more likely to have such high-speed connections, other studies have concluded.

Similarly, communities where adults voted and households participated in the US Census tended to have lower learning losses.

In general, institutional trust also mattered. The researchers write that communities where the majority of residents trusted institutions “may have been more willing to cooperate with their local schools and reduce disruption to student learning.”

Distrust may have been fueled by a number of factors, including the spread of pandemic-related political disinformation and suspicions stemming from deep-seated biases.

Overall, the study found that communities with a certain degree of cohesion and institutional involvement tend to provide a kind of safety net for children. “Communities with greater social capital, greater civic and volunteer participation, and greater connections among residents could better maintain social connections among residents and better support schools and households,” write the authors of the Education Recovery Scorecard.

What’s next?

Elementary students follow their teachers down the corridor to their classroom.

Ellis Elementary School students follow their teacher Megan Westmore to her classroom on August 22, 2022 in Denver. (R.J. Sangosti/Denver Post via Getty Images)

Educators across the country have been desperate to catch up with students with intensive teaching and other forms of correction. But this may not be enough. The authors of the sobering Education Recovery Scorecard say better education is needed. And they point to an offer that may not be very popular with students: summer school.

“It seems clear that we need to approach recovery as an ongoing effort,” they write. “In order to fully recover, districts will need to continue to invest the agreed funds into student education in the coming years.”

HEALTH

Biden says he’s ‘confident’ of hitting debt ceiling

Published

on

WASHINGTON. President Joe Biden on Wednesday said he was confident Congressional leaders could reach an agreement to raise the country’s borrowing limit before the time for a potential default expires.

“I am confident that we will get an agreement on the budget,” Biden said at the White House, calling the talks “polite and respectful.” He added: “Everyone came in good faith.”

“We are going to unite because there is no alternative,” he added. “Every leader in the room understands the consequences of failure.”

Biden insisted he was not in talks to raise the debt ceiling and said the talks were about spending.

Asked if he would accept job requirements for some federal aid programs, a potential stumbling block in negotiations, Biden left the door open but said he would not accept “much more” of the Clinton-era policies he supported as a senator.

Biden spoke minutes before leaving for Japan, where he will meet with world leaders. He cut his trip short to return to the US to continue debt talks, but said he would hold a press conference on the final talks on Sunday.

Republicans are pushing for stricter rules on federal aid programs, such as tighter job requirements, a potential hurdle in the countdown to prevent a default.

Biden opened the door to some concessions but said he would not consider cuts that could push people into poverty. The President appeared to harden his stance late Tuesday night after state negotiators met at the Capitol. The Democrats dismissed the Republicans’ pleas as untenable.

“The policies proposed by Republicans in the House of Representatives will deprive Americans of medical care and increase poverty,” said White House spokesman Michael Kikukawa. “Republicans couldn’t pass them into law when they had unified control of the government and the president is fighting to keep them out of the bipartisan budget deal.”

Negotiations have become more urgent as Biden heads to meet G-7 allies and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen reiterated that the US could hit the debt ceiling as early as June 1.

After meeting with congressional leaders on Tuesday, Biden said he would cut short his trip to return to the negotiating table in Washington. Biden said there was an “overwhelming consensus” among the group that defaulting on the debt was impossible.

Biden and the Democratic-controlled Senate are adamant that the bill to remove the debt ceiling should be considered separately from next year’s budget. Meanwhile, the Republican-led House of Representatives has called for the budget to be returned to FY22 levels and has been firm on the need for work requirements for federal aid programs.

Continue Reading

HEALTH

Abortion pill case: where is the pill lawsuit now? | abortion

Published

on

On Wednesday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will consider the future of mifepristone, a key drug used in more than half of U.S. abortions, after a district court judge ruled that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was wrong to approve it more than two times. decades. back. Access to the drug remains unchanged in states where abortion is legal while the case is pending.

The hearings follow a long string of court decisions. In late April, the Supreme Court blocked court-ordered restrictions on the use of mifepristone, while a lawsuit against birth control pills continues.

The lawsuit is the most important abortion rights case to come to court since Roe v. Wade was dropped in 2022. Fourteen states have banned abortion in the past 11 months, but the new restrictions on the pill will apply even in states where the procedure is still legal.

What’s happened?

In November, the lawsuit was filed by the Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), claiming that The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) overstepped its regulatory authority and ignored safety concerns when it approved mifepristone, a drug that blocks progesterone, a hormone needed for pregnancy, more than two decades ago. The FDA vehemently rejected these arguments, pointing to repeated and rigorous reviews of the highly regulated drug.

Trump-appointed Texas federal judge Matthew Kachsmaric sided with the plaintiffs, issuing an April 7 preliminary injunction suspending a 23-year FDA approval of mifepristone. He also supported the plaintiffs’ view that a previously dormant 150-year-old anti-vice law called the Comstock Act “explicitly bans abortions by mail.”

The ADF is believed to have decided to file a lawsuit in Amarillo, Texas specifically for him to appear before Kaczmarik, who is known for his anti-abortion views and used anti-abortion rhetoric throughout his decision, calling mifepristone a cure. used to “kill the unborn person”.

The Biden administration took the decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, where two judges also appointed by Donald Trump blocked part of the ruling overturning the FDA’s original 2000 approval of mifepristone, but reimposed restrictions on the drug previously lifted by the FDA. . These include limiting the use of mifepristone after seven weeks of pregnancy (it is currently approved up to 10 weeks) and not delivering it by mail. In 2021, the FDA decided to remove the requirement to dispense the drug in person during the pandemic, which expanded access to allow the drug to be prescribed via telemedicine and mailed.

The Biden administration appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, which temporarily blocked the lower courts’ decisions, remanding the case to the Fifth Circuit. The High Court also ruled that access to birth control pills would remain unchanged while the lawsuit is pending, which is likely to go back to the Supreme Court.

What is the status of the abortion pill?

At the moment, mifepristone is not prohibited, and access to it remains unchanged as the case progresses. Misoprostol, the second drug commonly prescribed with mifepristone for medical abortion, is not considered in this lawsuit.

Even the Supreme Court’s decision shouldn’t matter much in states where abortion is already banned: neither misoprostol nor mifepristone have been legally available for abortion in those states since the bans went into effect after Row’s fall.

Although misoprostol, which promotes uterine emptying by causing softening and dilation of the cervix and uterine contractions, can be safely used on its own, it is less effective. Abortions using misoprostol alone lead to a successful termination of pregnancy in 88% of cases, with more complex side effects and a greater need for follow-up. recent studies have shown.

Some of the major providers of abortions, including Planned Parenthood, Carafem and Abortion Delivered, have confirmed that they are ready to prescribe misoprostol-only regimen for abortion if mifepristone is withdrawn from the market. Aid Access, an international group that supplies abortion pills in the US, has successfully piloted misoprostol-only abortion regimens during the pandemic.

What is Comstock’s Law?

Court monitors are watching to see what judges have to say, if anything, about the Comstock Act, an 1873 anti-corruption law that banned the mailing of certain goods, such as contraceptives, pornography, and abortifacients. This law has actually been dead for a long time, but the plaintiffs have tried to revive it, suggesting that the FDA violated the Comstock Act when it allowed mail-order pills in 2021. Other anti-abortion activists made similar efforts to bring the law back, seeing it as a possible way to ban abortion nationwide.

The Department of Justice issued opinion at Comstock in December 2022, clarifying his own view that the law does not apply when the sender of the pills intends to use them legally. When the appeals court first heard the mifepristone case in April, the panel of judges seemed to uphold the plaintiffs’ argument about Comstock, writing that the “plain text” of the law prohibited the mailing of abortion drugs, whether or not they were intended for abortion.

If Comstock is eventually found to be good law, it will have a huge impact on abortion in the US, as it could also be interpreted as a ban on mailing any tools used to perform abortions.

What could this case mean for access to abortion?

If mifepristone becomes less available, and since medical abortion accounts for more than half of all abortions in the United States, healthcare professionals fear surge in demand about clinics providing surgical interventions. Many are already experiencing difficulties due to the increase in the number of patients arriving from states where abortion is banned or severely restricted.

Online pharmacies and other telehealth providers have gone viral since Roe v. Wade was dropped, made possible by a 2021 FDA decision to allow the sale of abortion pills. sent by mail. If the court ultimately decides that mifepristone cannot be mailed, this could lead to the closure of these businesses.

Do the consequences of the case go beyond abortion?

The Biden administration, along with a coalition of drug companies, has warned of ensuing regulatory havoc on drug approvals if the judiciary is allowed to issue rulings on mifepristone, which the FDA opposes.

“If this ruling remains in place, there will be virtually no FDA-approved prescription that is immune from such political and ideological attacks,” Biden said. written statement after Kaczmarik’s decision in early April.

Continue Reading

HEALTH

Wollongong plantation shutters are the perfect window treatment for your home

Published

on

Window treatments are an essential part of any home decor. They can add style and functionality to your living spaces, as well as provide privacy and control the amount of natural light that enters your home. Plantation shutters are a popular and versatile window treatment option that can enhance the look of any room in your home. In this article, we take a look at why Wollongong blinds are a great choice for homeowners looking to update their windows.

Individual fit

One of the key benefits of plantation blinds in Wollongong is their custom fit. These blinds can be tailored to any window size or shape, ensuring they fit and look great in any room. If you have standard windows or irregularly shaped windows, plantation shutters Wollongong can be customized according to your needs. This is especially important for homeowners in Wollongong, where the windows of many houses have unique sizes and shapes.

energy efficiency

Plantation blinds are also an energy efficient window treatment. They provide an extra layer of insulation that helps keep your home cool in summer and warm in winter. By blocking out direct sunlight, plantation shutters can reduce the amount of heat entering your home, making it easier to maintain a comfortable temperature. This can help cut your energy bills and lower your carbon footprint, making plantation shutters a great choice for environmentally conscious homeowners.

Privacy and lighting control

Another advantage of plantation shutters in Wollongong is their ability to provide privacy and light control. These blinds can be easily adjusted to control the amount of natural light that enters your home, making it easy to create a bright and inviting space or a cozy and intimate atmosphere. They also provide a high level of privacy, making them ideal for bedrooms, bathrooms and other areas where privacy is important.

Durability and maintenance

Plantation shutters are also known for their durability and low maintenance requirements. Unlike other window treatments such as curtains or blinds, plantation shutters are made from durable materials that can withstand wear and tear. They are also easy to clean, just a quick wipe with a damp cloth to keep them looking their best. This makes them the perfect choice for busy families with pets or children.

Style and aesthetics

Finally, Wollongong plantation shutters are an attractive and stylish window treatment option that can enhance the look of any room. They add a classic and sophisticated touch to any decor style and can be customized to match your home’s color and design. Whether you prefer a traditional or contemporary look, there are plantation blinds designs to complement your home.

Choosing the Right Blinds for Plantations in Wollongong

There are several factors to consider when choosing plantation shutters in Wollongong. First, you will need to choose the right materials. Plantation shutters are usually made from wood, PVC, or aluminum, each with its own unique advantages and disadvantages. Wooden shutters give a classic and elegant look, while PVC and aluminum shutters are durable and easy to clean.

You will also need to consider the style of your plantation blinds. They can be adapted to different window shapes and sizes and can be opened and closed in a variety of ways. For example, double-leaf shutters can be folded to the side to provide a good view, while sliding shutters can be moved horizontally to provide easy access to windows.

Lastly, it is important to work with a reputable and experienced supplier when choosing plantation shutters in Wollongong. They will be able to provide you with a range of options to suit your specific needs and preferences, and can also offer professional installation services to make sure your blinds are installed correctly and securely. It is important to choose a supplier with a good reputation for quality and customer service, as this will ensure that you receive the best possible product and support.

In conclusion, Wollongong plantation shutters are a great window treatment option for homeowners looking to improve the style, functionality, and energy efficiency of their homes. With custom fit, energy efficiency, privacy, lighting control, durability and stylish design, they are a smart investment that can add value and comfort to your home. By working with a reputable supplier and choosing the right materials and style, you can enjoy the benefits of plantation shutters in Wollongong for years to come.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 Culture Belle Media.