EEuropean lawmakers are putting the finishing touches on a set of broad rules designed to govern the use of artificial intelligence that, if passed, would make the EU the first major jurisdiction outside of China to adopt targeted regulation of AI. This has made the forthcoming law the subject of fierce debate and lobbying, with opposing sides fighting to have its scope either expanded or narrowed.

Legislators are close to agreeing on a draft law, Financial Times informed last week. After that, the law will move on to negotiations between the member states of the bloc and the executive branch.

The EU AI law is likely to ban controversial AI uses such as social scoring and facial recognition in public places, and force companies to declare whether copyrighted material is being used to train their AI.

The rules could set a global bar for how companies build and deploy their AI systems, as it may be easier for companies to comply with EU rules globally than to build different products for different regions—a phenomenon known as the “Brussels effect.”

“The EU AI law will definitely set the regulatory tone: what does comprehensive AI regulation look like?” says Amba Kak, executive director of the AI ​​Now Institute, a policy research group based at New York University.

One of the Act’s most contentious points is whether the so-called “general purpose AI” – on which ChatGPT is based – should be considered high risk and thus subject to the strictest rules and penalties for misuse. On one side of the debate are big tech companies and a conservative bloc of politicians who have argued that defining general purpose AI as “high risk” will stifle innovation. On the other, a group of progressive politicians and technologists who argue that excluding powerful general-purpose artificial intelligence systems from the new rules would be akin to accepting social media regulation that does not apply to Facebook or TikTok.

Read more: Artificial intelligence from A to Z

Those who call for the regulation of general purpose AI models argue that only the developers of general purpose AI systems have a realistic understanding of how these models learn and therefore the bias and harm that can result. They say the big tech companies behind AI — the only ones that can change how these general-purpose systems are built — will be exonerated if the burden of AI security is shifted to smaller companies downstream.

in the open letter published earlier this month, more than 50 AI institutions and experts spoke out against the removal of general purpose AI from EU rules. “Considering [general purpose AI] how low risk frees the companies at the heart of the AI ​​industry to make critical choices about how these models are built, how they work, and who they work for during development and calibration. ,” says Meredith Whittaker, president of the Signal Foundation and signer of the letter. “This will free them from scrutiny, even if these general purpose AIs are the core of their business model.”

Big tech companies like Google and Microsoft, which have invested billions of dollars in AI, are opposing these proposals, according to a report by the Corporate Europe Observatory. Lobbyists argue that only when general-purpose AI is applied to “high-risk” use cases — often by smaller companies using them to build more niche applications — does it become dangerous, the Observatory says. report states.

“General purpose AI systems are not target dependent: they are generic in design and do not pose a high risk in and of themselves, as these systems are not designed for any specific target,” Google claims in a document that was sent to the commissioners’ offices. EU in the summer of 2022, which the Corporate Europe Observatory received on freedom of information requests and made public last week. According to Google, classifying general purpose artificial intelligence systems as “high risk” could harm consumers and hinder innovation in Europe.

Microsoft, OpenAI’s largest investor, has made similar arguments through industry groups of which it is a member. “There is no need for the AI ​​Act to have a dedicated section on GPAI. [general purpose AI]”, industry group letter signed by Microsoft in 2022. “GPAI software vendors cannot exhaustively guess and anticipate the AI ​​solutions that will be built from their software.” Microsoft has also lobbied for the EU’s AI Act, which “unduely burdens innovation”, through The Software Alliance, an industry lobbying group it founded in 1998. arguesmust be “assigned to a user who may expose general purpose AI to exploitation risk”. [case]”, and not the developer of the general-purpose system itself.

A Microsoft spokesperson declined to comment. Google representatives did not respond to requests for comment in time for publication.

Read more: The AI ​​arms race is changing everything

The EU AI law was first drafted in 2021, at a time when AI was mostly narrow tools applied to narrow use cases. But over the past two years, major tech companies have begun to successfully develop and launch powerful “general-purpose” artificial intelligence systems that can perform innocuous tasks like writing poetry while at the same time capable of much riskier behavior. (Think of OpenAI’s GPT-4 or Google’s LaMDA.) Under the prevailing business model that has since emerged, these large companies license their powerful general-purpose AI to other businesses, who often tailor it to specific tasks and make it available to the public through application or interface.

Read more: The new Bing with artificial intelligence threatens users. It’s not funny

Some argue that the EU has put itself in a stalemate by structuring the AI ​​Law in an outdated way. “The main issue here is that the whole way they structured the EU law many years ago was to have risk categories for different uses of AI,” says Helen Toner, OpenAI board member and director of strategy at Georgetown. university. Center for Security and New Technologies. “The problem they’re having right now is that large language models – general purpose models – don’t have a built-in use case. It’s a big shift in how AI works.”

“Once these models are trained, they are not trained to do anything in particular,” says Toner. “Even the people who make them don’t really know what they can and can’t do. I expect it will probably be years before we really know everything GPT-4 can and can’t do. This is very difficult for a piece of legislation that is built around classifying AI systems according to levels of risk based on their use case.”

Write Billy Perrigo: billy.perrigo@time.com.

The Evil Dead Rise understands the task.

The new film is the first feature-length installation in the immortal Evil Dead franchise since director Fede Alvarez’s divisive 2013 reboot hit theaters 10 years ago. The Evil Dead Rise however, does not represent a sequel to Alvarez’s reboot. Instead, the film functions as an anthology episode within a long-running series, meaning it contains little or no nod to the previous year’s events. evil Dead films, including those directed by Sam Raimi in the 1980s and 90s. Sometimes it’s the disconnection of the narrative from what happened before it’s gone The Evil Dead Rise feeling of some weightlessness.

Luckily, writer/director Lee Cronin knows how to make the film a natural addition to the beloved horror franchise without relying on too many literal connections. The film is filled with gore, gore, and general nastiness that fans have come to expect from the Evil Dead franchise. In the film’s thankfully brief 96-minute runtime, Cronin is able to scare you, piss you off, and make you laugh at even the darkest of moments. The director’s only real crime is that he made an Evil Dead movie, which is perfectly fine and funny enough, though not necessarily extraordinary.

The film opens, like most Evil Dead sequels, with him racing through the trees in a forest that can be found almost anywhere in America. Within The Evil Dead RiseHowever, in the first few minutes, Cronin not only manages to pay homage to the most famous shot from Raimi’s classic 1981 horror film, but he can also continue his tribute with a joke that feels too meta to work the way it works. . Just minutes later, Cronin is once again honoring Raimi’s enduring legacy using Emily Brontë. Wuthering Heights to poke fun at one all-too-common image of the movie and create one of the most truly frightening beats in the history of the Evil Dead franchise.

All of these moments unfold in an opening prologue that, for the most part, has little to no narrative connection to the rest of the film’s story, yet effectively draws new Evil Dead viewers on just such a brutal, darkly funny ride. what awaits them. The film then spends most of its time with Beth (Lily Sullivan), a guitar luthier, who finds out she is pregnant and decides to travel to Los Angeles to pay an unannounced visit to her sister Ellie (Alyssa Sutherland) and her nieces. and nephew of Cassie (Nell Fisher), Bridget (Gabrielle Echols) and Danny (Morgan Davis).

However, Beth’s desire for life advice from her sister quickly fizzles when Danny discovers not only the Book of the Dead hidden in a bank vault under his family’s apartment building, but also a series of vinyl records that reveal the evil spirits contained within its pages. These spirits ambush and possess Ellie Sutherland, transforming her from a loving mother into a bloodthirsty entity hell-bent on killing every person in the film’s central abandoned apartment building, including members of her own family.

As Sutherland-obsessed Ellie either finds new ways to break into her family’s apartment or always stands guard at her door, The Evil Dead Rise spends most of his work time within the same apartment. This aspect not only makes the film look like evil Dead the smallest installment in the franchise to date, but also the most suffocating. The film’s characters have almost nowhere to go, and Cronin uses their constant proximity to danger to keep the film’s tension at an almost unbearable level for much of its second half.

In the moments when Ellie and the other characters in the film come face to face, Cronin wholeheartedly embraces a kind of over-the-top horror brutality that oscillates between cartoony and chilling horror. One point related to the unfortunate removal of another character’s eyeball, it seems that it could have come from Funny melodies cartoon, while another with a cheese grater strikes the perfect balance between tongue-in-cheek humor and pure inner horror. The film does not have as many outstanding sets as some of its evil Dead predecessors, but it still delivers more than a few moments that are truly memorable, if only for how shockingly brutal they are.

The Evil Dead RiseLimited coverage poses several noteworthy problems for Cronin. The director often assigns his characters to different rooms, even if it defies all logic, solely so that he has time and space to create new threats. A long stay of one character in the kitchen is especially annoying. The Evil Dead Risethe admittedly vague sense of logic is close to breaking point. While Cronin and cinematographer Dave Garbett often find unexpected new ways to visually express the film’s nightmarish reality, The Evil Dead Rise that look dirty and underlit, making it hard to stay lost in your world all the time.

Ultimately, despite the refreshing urban environment, The Evil Dead Rise does not take his franchise to any places that seem so new. The movie’s plot follows a lot of the same moments as the previous ones, and along the way, Cronin actually makes you feel the same pervasive sense of hopelessness that Beth and the kids she’s suddenly assigned to protect. Intuitively efficient and intense like The Evil Dead Rise gets, however, anyone who is even remotely familiar with the previous installments of the franchise will be able to predict where it will go for most of the time it runs.

The familiar nature of its history and structure does not allow The Evil Dead Rise because – pardon the pun – it has risen too far above its contemporary horror rivals. For a long time evil Dead fans, that won’t necessarily be a problem. The film is, in many ways, exactly what evil Dead A franchise is needed: a competent and energetic comeback that doesn’t so much reinvent the show’s formula as it reminds viewers of the pleasures it has been able to provide all along. Due to this The Evil Dead Rise is a small achievement – as deliciously mean and ruthlessly brutal as fans want.

Not that there were some really great aspects to it. The Evil Dead Rise, or. Alyssa Sutherland’s performance as Ellie is so physically impressive that she makes you feel every unnatural move her possessed character makes and taste the poison in every deliberately horrible thing she says. Cronin, for his part, is also expanding the film’s influence beyond the Evil Dead franchise. In particular, Stanley Kubrick has several knots. Shineincluding one homage that is so blatant that it has no right to be as effective as it is.

Perhaps the same can be said about The Evil Dead Rise, a film that comfortably runs many of the same moves as its predecessors, yet still manages to hook you in. Thus, the film proves once again that some formulas are indeed harder to kill than others.

The Evil Dead Rise now plays in theaters. If you want to know all the spoilers about the movie, read the Evil Dead Rise ending explanation.

Editorial Recommendations

information launched its first six Alder Lake-S processors on Wednesday night. The SKUs that form the initial roster of 12th Gen Intel Core processors are detailed in the table below. In short, these are Intel Core i9-12900K/KF, Intel Core i7-12700K/KF and Intel Core i5-12600K/KF. By suffixes, seasoned bit technologists will know that these are all unlocked enthusiast processors, and the “KF” chips sold with iGPUs have been processed without communication with the outside world.

The highlights of the launch of the first Intel 7 product were mostly what we were missing after Intel Architecture Day in August: specific SKU release information, a small amount of testing, and some input from Intel partners regarding the first 600 series. motherboards and DDR5 RAM kits. We have all of that now, but Intel is not allowing third-party reviews to be posted until CPUs and PCs go public starting November 4th.

Above you can see all the new SKUs. You can see a combination of P and E cores, base and turbo frequencies, as well as caches and so on. Important new data in this table includes base processor power and maximum power in Turbo mode. You can disregard the lower power as all enthusiast motherboards will run the new processors with a higher power limit shown to maximize their potential.

Considering that the top-end Intel Core i9-12900K processor unleashes the potential of these 12th generation Core processors, Intel claims that this chip is “the best gaming processor in the world.” It has 16 cores and 24 threads and runs at up to 5.2GHz, but in your high end cooler it will draw over 240W under heavy loads.

At last night’s event, Intel showed some results from its own benchmarks, demonstrating a “gaming lead”. You can see the chart he shared right above that suggests the Intel i9-12900K is about 12 percent faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in modern PC gaming. Unfortunately, it appears that Intel systems running Windows 11 have not been updated with AMD/Microsoft patches in order for AMD L3 caching and “preferred kernel technology” to work properly. Be aware that these issues can slow down the game on AMD platforms by as much as 15%.

Intel has been better at claiming achievements in content creation than its own previous-generation flagship processors. In these CPU-intensive cases, 12th Gen processors were at least a third faster than their 11th Gen ancestors. Of course, more cores and creative multi-core applications have played an important role in these rises.

For your interest, I have embedded a comparison shot of the Intel i9-12900K die below as shared by Der8auer. You can also check out some fancy plates and pictures courtesy of HardwareLuxx editor Andreas Schilling. on twitter.

The flagship Core i9-12900K is rumored to be $590, the Core i7-12700K is $410 and the Core i5-12600K is $290.

Along with the new processors, Intel has introduced brand new 600 series chipsets. In terms of enthusiast-level desktop processors, partners such as Asus, Gigabyte and MSI have successfully released motherboards based on the Z690 chipset. The new motherboards provide advanced and modern I/O technologies such as PCIe 5.0, DDR5 (typically), fast integrated wired and wireless networks and more as standard.

Many new motherboards have been discovered, for example, only Asus has nineteen Z690 models out-of-the-box, covering all kinds of features and sizes (E-ATX, ATX, mATX and mini-ITX). Similar aorAnd G.Skill are also showing off their new DDR5 memory modules.