What does Fox say?

V letter filed by Foxthe company believed it aired allegations of voting machine rigging because they came from the incumbent and those close to him and were thus newsworthy.

“The incumbent’s attempt to challenge the election results and change the outcome of his re-election bid is newsworthy,” the document says. “Therefore, the media throughout the country and around the world widely covered and commented on the president’s allegations and trials.”

Fox claimed that “Fox News has lived up to its commitment to full disclosure and unbiased commentary,” adding that “some presenters were skeptical of the president’s claims; others looked at them hopefully; everyone recognized them as deeply informational.”

The network claims to have covered Dominion’s denials and given the company a chance to make its point.

“In short, Fox News has done exactly what the First Amendment protects: it has provided the public with access to newsmakers and critical information that would help foster an “uninhibited, active and wide open” debate about fast-moving events of unprecedented importance.” V litigation according to Fox’s lawyers.

Fox also argues that “the Dominion lawsuit is an attack on the First Amendment and the free press.”

Who is expected to take the position?

According to Associated PressCarlson, Hannity and Murdoch are expected to testify. Many also believe that Pirro, Scott and former host Lou Dobbs will also take the position.

Can you watch it on TV?

No cameras will be allowed under Delaware court policy, and a judge recently denied media companies’ request to broadcast audio excerpts.

What are the possible outcomes?

If Fox loses, the company is likely to be stuck with big payouts, its stock price could suffer and its reputation damaged. Fox News claims that if it loses, the case would damage press freedom and the First Amendment.

“Free, vibrant American discourse depends on First Amendment protection for news gathering and press reporting,” a Fox Network spokesperson said in a statement. The newspaper “New York Times.

If Dominion loses, not only will it keep the media defamation bar extremely high, it could push Fox News and other networks into even more defamation in the future.

“If Fox misses one thing that it says is that there are limits to propaganda, to lies on TV… to misinforming your viewers,” said Jay Rosen, professor of journalism at New York University. CNN. “If Fox wins, it kind of says otherwise, there are no limits.”

Whatever happens in the Dominion trial, this is far from the end of Fox News’ problems. in 2021, Smartmatic, a London-based global technology company, also filed a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit. against Fox News and Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo, former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and Dobbs.

The lawsuit was filed after a series of false claims about Smartmatic voting machines and the 2020 elections were posted online. About a month ago, the New York State Supreme Court Manhattan gave the go-ahead to keep the Smartmatic business going.

Campaign Action

This letter is a preview of what the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has just sent its own requesting information to Raven about giftsyou will most likely hear back. The committee requested a list of all gifts to Thomas worth more than $415. Any gift exceeding this amount must be declared in accordance with federal disclosure rules for high-ranking federal officials, including justices of the Supreme Court.

However, this is not necessarily the end of the Finance Committee investigation. Wyden left the door open for “research using other tools at the committee’s disposal” during the investigation. These tools may include subpoenaing Crowe to obtain documents or obtaining them from the IRS. Tax committees in both the House of Representatives and the Senate have the right under the tax code to receive tax returns from individuals.

There could be a flaw in this plan: Crowe bought himself a “golden passport” in the famous tax haven of St. Kitts and Nevis, according to documents provided by a whistleblower to the Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation as part of his Passport documents investigation and reviewed by the Project on State Supervision and informed in Interception. Crowe and his brother bought the passports in 2012 and it’s unclear if they renewed them last year, but they still held them last year.

If Crowe used the tax haven granted to him by this dual citizenship, it may be harder for Widen to get any useful information from the IRS.

Senate Republicans, always happy to ally with the rich and corrupt, vow to oppose any attempt by Wyden to get information. Idaho Senator Mike Crapo, the top Republican on the Finance Committee, said that continuing the investigation “would undermine the independence of the Supreme Court and its individual judges.” As if the judge, who spent the last few decades in the pocket of a billionaire, is somehow “independent”.

Senator Dianne Feinstein is returning to Congress after more than two months away due to illness, her office confirmed on Tuesday.

Feinstein, 89, has not voted since mid-February after being diagnosed and briefly hospitalized with shingles. She was on her way back to Washington on Tuesday afternoon, according to a Senate Democratic aide.

Several lawmakers called for the California Democrat’s resignation as her absence dragged on, saying it stalled the Senate’s process to confirm President Joe Biden’s candidacy for a judge.

Representative Ro Hanna of California, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Rashida Tlaib of Minnesota called for resignation, citing concerns about her age and health. On May 5, the New York Times editors similarly called for Feinstein to resign.

“If she fails to fulfill her obligations to the Senate and her constituents, she must step down and hand over her duties to a designated successor,” the editorial wrote.